Drawing for SUNBELT SOFTWARE

USPTO serial 78315251

SUNBELT SOFTWARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SUNBELT SOFTWARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Monica B. Mason, Esq.

MONICA B. MASON FOWLER WHITE BOGGS P.A.501 E. KENNEDY BLVD.SUITE 1700TAMPA, FL 33602

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for computer system and application deployment and managementABANDONEDNov 12, 1996
035Distributorship services directed to resellers, home and business users featuring computer software products; retail store services featuring computer software via telephone, fax and purchase order; on-line retail store services providing computer software productsABANDONEDMay 1, 1996
042Computer software development; consulting services regarding the implementation and use of computer programs; technical support, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problemsABANDONEDMay 1, 1996

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 18, 2010MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Nov 18, 2010ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Nov 18, 2010OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Nov 18, 2010OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jul 7, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 17, 2006OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 27, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 14, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 14, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 14, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 10, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 9, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 9, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 9, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 1, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 17, 2005PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Sep 12, 2005PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jun 22, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 17, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 10, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 10, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 12, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 12, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 19, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 11, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 11, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 15, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance