Drawing for ORCHARD

USPTO serial 78315367

ORCHARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COLEMAN, CIMMERIAN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - LEGAL INSTRUMENTS EXAMINER

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ORCHARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patricia S. Smart

BRIAN R WOODWORTH HOSPIRA INC275 N FIELD DRDEPT NLEG BLDG H-1LAKE FOREST, IL 60045

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical preparations, namely anesthetics, contrast agents for ultrasound, CT, and MRI diagnostic imaging procedures, sedatives, anti-infectives, cardiovascular pharmaceuticals, anti-emetics, and diluents for use in reconstituting and diluting other pharmaceutical agents; and dietetic substances, namely vitamins, lipids, amino acids form medical purposes, and electrolytesACTIVE—
009Computer software for monitoring, managing, and recording medication and nutritional product delivery to patientsACTIVE—
010Surgical and medical apparatus, namely drug infusion pumps, medical needles, catheters, medical tubes and tube sets, syringes, ampoules, single and multi-dose vials, blood sampling systems, angiography kits comprising catheters, vascular and cardiac monitoring systems comprising catheters, and transducers for vascular and cardiac monitoring systemsACTIVE—
044Providing information regarding medical conditions, pharmaceuticals, and treatments to healthcare providers and patientsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 5, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Apr 5, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 5, 2005EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 2, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 2, 2004CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 31, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 5, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 5, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 26, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance