USPTO serial 78315609
MCARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MCARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | FINANCIAL SERVICES, NAMELY, BANKING AND CREDIT CARD SERVICES; PROVIDING CREDIT CARD, DEBIT CARD, CHARGE CARD AND STORED VALUE PREPAID CARD SERVICES; REMOTE PAYMENT SERVICES; STORED VALUE ELECTRONIC PURSE SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF PROVIDING ON-LINE STORED VALUE ACCOUNTS IN AN ELECTRONIC ENVIRONMENTS, ISSUING STORED VALUE CARDS; PROVIDING ELECTRONIC FUNDS AND CURRENCY TRANSFER SERVICES, ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS SERVICES, PREPAID TELEPHONE CALLING CARD SERVICES, CASH DISBURSEMENT SERVICES, AND TRANSACTION AUTHORIZATION AND SETTLEMENT SERVICES; PROVISION OF DEBIT AND CREDIT SERVICES BY MEANS OF RADIO FREQUENCY IDENTIFICATION DEVICES KNOWN AS TRANSPONDERS; TRAVEL INSURANCE SERVICES; CHEQUE VERIFICATION SERVICES; ISSUING AND REDEMPTION SERVICES ALL RELATING TO TRAVELLERS CHEQUES AND TRAVEL VOUCHERS; THE PROVISION OF FINANCIAL SERVICES FOR THE SUPPORT OF RETAIL SERVICES PROVIDED THROUGH MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATIONS MEANS, NAMELY, PAYMENT SERVICES THROUGH WIRELESS DEVICES; BILL PAYMENT SERVICES PROVIDED THROUGH A WEBSITE; ON-LINE BANKING; FINANCIAL SERVICES, NAMELY, BANKING AND CREDIT CARD SERVICES PROVIDED OVER THE TELEPHONE AND BY MEANS OF A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK OR THE INTERNET | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 17, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 17, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 26, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 12, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 25, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |