Drawing for SANTA TERESA SUPERIOR GOLD

USPTO serial 78315708

SANTA TERESA SUPERIOR GOLD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STEPHENS, SONYA B
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SANTA TERESA SUPERIOR GOLD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael L. Lovitz, Esq.

MICHAEL L LOVITZ ESQ CONNOLLY BOVE LODGE & HUTZ LLPP O BOX 2207WILMINGTON, DE 19899UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033rumACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 19, 2007MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Nov 19, 2007ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 16, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2007GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2007GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2007CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Apr 18, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 9, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 9, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 9, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 9, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 5, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 27, 2006GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 27, 2006CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Sep 27, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 3, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 13, 2005GRMLCORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 23, 2005GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 19, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 22, 2005GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 22, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 4, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 3, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 25, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 25, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 16, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 3, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance