Drawing for BULLDOGIT

USPTO serial 78316119

BULLDOGIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BULLDOGIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert L. Brewer

ROBERT P FELBER JR WALLER LANSDEN DORTCH & DAVIS PLLCPO BOX 198966 511 UNION ST STE 2700NASHVILLE CITY CTRNASHVILLE, TN 37219-8966

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer programs used to access and process clinical patient information for the healthcare industryACTIVEJun 1, 2002
042maintaining and providing access to a comprehensive computer-based data repository containing demographic, clinical, financial and healthcare provider information for the healthcare industryACTIVEJun 1, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 2, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 2, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 3, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 3, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 1, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 19, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 18, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 4, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 28, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 20, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 21, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 21, 2004AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Apr 21, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 20, 2004PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 4, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance