USPTO serial 78316185
LANDSCAPE OF TUSCANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LANDSCAPE OF TUSCANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Allen J Baden
ALLEN J BADEN KENYON & KENYONONE BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Wall coverings, namely, decorative tiles and ceramic tiles | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Decorative wooden boxes, umbrella stands, plaques, picture frames, jewelry boxes not of metal, bottle closures not of metal, and decorative tables not for commercial or office use | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Plates, cups, mugs, saucers, and bowls; beverage glassware; food and beverage storage canisters, pitchers, condiment containers, butter dishes, cream and sugar basins, buckets for wine, coffee/tea pots not made of precious metal, wine carafes, salt and pepper shakers; serving platters, serving trays not made of precious metal, trivets, kitchen ladles, serving ladles, and cooking and serving utensils, namely, salad servers; holders for place cards, napkin rings not of precious metal, plastic coasters, coasters not of paper and not of table linen, ceramic jars, decorative ceramic ornaments, ceramic fruits, glass ornaments and glass candies, candlesticks not made of precious metal, and vases; baking dishes, cruets not made of precious metal, urns, pots, household utensils, namely, strainers, soup tureens, casserole dishes, cake stands, and soup rests; salt and pepper grinders; planters; wastepaper baskets, ceramic baskets, and wooden baskets; non-metal ornamental ceramic boxes; and terra cotta statues | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Textile napkins and textile place mats, bed and table covers | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | Ornamental novelty pins | ACTIVE | — |
| 033 | Wine and distilled spirits | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Wholesale distributorship and retail store services in the field of ceramic tiles, wooden boxes, umbrella stands, plaques, picture frames, jewelry boxes, bottle closures, tables, ornamental novelty pins, plates, cups, mugs, saucers, bowls, beverage glassware, food and beverage storage canisters, servers, pitchers, condiment servers, butter dishes, cream and sugar basins, buckets for wine, coffee/tea pots, wine carafes, salt and pepper shakers, platters, trays, trivets, ladles, cooking and serving utensils, holders for place cards, napkin rings, coasters, decorative boxes, ceramic jars, ceramic ornaments and fruits, glass ornaments and candies, candlesticks, vases, baking dishes, cruets, urns, pots, strainers, soup tureens, casserole dishes, cake stands, soup rests, salt and pepper grinders, planters, waste paper baskets, ceramic baskets, wooden baskets, tissue boxes, terra cotta statues, stationary and pens, napkins and place mats, furniture, wall hangings, planters, statues, ornaments and candles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Martin, Scherer
- Other trademarks owned by Martin, Scherer
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named LANDSCAPE OF TUSCANY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 31, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 27, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 4, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 15, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 3, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 6, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 13, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 5, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |