USPTO serial 78316911
LOTUS OF ENGLAND SKILL & INTEGRITY SINCE 1759
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3910240Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 25, 2011
- Examiner
- BOAGNI, MARY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LOTUS OF ENGLAND SKILL & INTEGRITY SINCE 1759?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LANCASHIRE, GB
Fii Footwear Management Limited
Northampton, GB
LANCASHIRE, GB
LANCASHIRE, GB
LANCASHIRE, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Miriam D. Trudell
MIRIAM D TRUDELL SHERIDAN ROSS PC1560 BROADWAY STE 1200DENVER, CO 80202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Footwear and shoes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by D. JACOBSON & SONS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Fii Footwear Management Limited
- Other trademarks owned by BRANDS GLOBAL LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by BRANDS GLOBAL LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by BRANDS GLOBAL LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named LOTUS OF ENGLAND SKILL & INTEGRITY SINCE 1759
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 9, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 7, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 27, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 30, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 8, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 25, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 17, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 12, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |