USPTO serial 78317110
SCOOPY DO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYES, GINA CLARK
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SCOOPY DO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James E. Scarbrough
JAMES E SCARBROUGH FAY, SHARPE, FAGAN, MINNICH & MCKEE LLP1100 SUPERIOR AVECLEVELAND, OH 44114UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | GENERAL PURPOSE METAL PORTABLE STORAGE CONTAINERS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 29, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 24, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |