USPTO serial 78317299
MARUYAMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2947790Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 10, 2005
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MARUYAMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher W. Brown
Christopher W. Brown Gunn Cain & Kinney LLP700 Deborah Road Suite 150Newberg, OR 97132UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Gas-powered blowers for lawn debris; gas-powered weed and grass string trimmers; gas-powered brush cutters; gas-powered hedge trimmers; gas-powered sprayers; gas-powered leaf blowers; gas-powered water pumps for use in irrigation, drainage, swimming pools and landscaping; gas-powered chemical pumps; gas-powered engines for general purposes and not for land vehicles, and gas-powered engines for lawn and garden machinery; gas-powered edgers; gas-powered spray pumps; gas-powered three-in-one system that includes an edger, a trimmer and hedge trimmer; gas-powered brushcutter | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 6, 2015 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 17, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 15, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 26, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 4, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 4, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 1, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 16, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |