Drawing for GIRLFRIENDS' GUIDE

USPTO serial 78317481

GIRLFRIENDS' GUIDE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GIRLFRIENDS' GUIDE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott Hunsaker

SCOTT HUNSAKER ATTN: IP DOCKET CLERKLOCKE LIDDELL & SAPP LLP600 TRAVIS STE 3400HOUSTON, TX 77002-3095

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Strollers; car safety seats; bicycle safety seats; jogging strollers; booster seats; accessories for strollers, car seats, booster seats, baby carriers and travel systems, namely, seat pads, neck and head supports, storage compartments, caddies, trays and holders, protective shields and covers, and car seat head supports; baby strollers; car safety seats for infants, toddlers, and children; baby carriers for use as car safety seats; travel systems for babies, comprised of infant carriers which may be used as car safety seats alone or in combination with a securing base or may be used to carry infants by hand in baby basket fashion, or may be used as the seat in a stroller; and infant umbrellas, namely, umbrellas to be affixed to baby strollersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 9, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 9, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 29, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 29, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 29, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 4, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 14, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 6, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 14, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 25, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 3, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 3, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 19, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 28, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 12, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 7, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 10, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance