Drawing for GIRLFRIENDS' GUIDE

USPTO serial 78317487

GIRLFRIENDS' GUIDE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GIRLFRIENDS' GUIDE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott Hunsaker

Scott Hunsaker LOCKE LORD BISSELL & LIDDELL LLPATTN: IP DOCKET CLERK600 Travis Suite 3400Houston, TX 77002-3095

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Children's activity books; children's books containing compilations of stickers; children's book covers; children's address books; children's stationery; children's greeting cards; children's printed invitations; children's memo pads; children's pens and pencils; children's pencil boxes and cases; children's writing tablets; children's book marks; children's erasers; children's calendars; children's posters; and children's photo albumsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 5, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 5, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 29, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 29, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 29, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 4, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 11, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 22, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 7, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 7, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 7, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 7, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 7, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 7, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 21, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2007RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 9, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 27, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 10, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 8, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 26, 2005GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 10, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 6, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 29, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 22, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 19, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 10, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance