USPTO serial 78317763
MAXIMISER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3895548Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 21, 2010
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MAXIMISER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
WESTMINSTER, SC
Toronto, CA
Toronto, CA
Toronto, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Victor Krichker
TORONTO ONC - ONTARIO M5H 3Y2VICTOR KRICHKER BERESKIN & PARRSCOTIA PLZ 40 KING ST W 40TH FL,Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Parts for fork-lift trucks, namely, a fork-positioning and side-shifting carriage for a fork-lift truck | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 16, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LIFT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Lift Technologies Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Lift Technologies Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Lift Technologies Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named MAXIMISER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 16, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 15, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 28, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 13, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 19, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 16, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 22, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |