USPTO serial 78317776
V.O.L.T.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, DAVID T
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with V.O.L.T.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leslie K. Mitchell
Leslie K. Mitchell Arent Fox LLP1675 BroadwayNew York, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software for optimizing product arrangement within a vending machine and displaying the optimized product arrangement | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Advice in the field of business management and marketing all relating to vending and dispensing machines and to software, parts and fittings therefore, and to products sold or dispensed through such machines; advice on the analysis of consumer buying habits and needs provided with the help of sensory, quality and quantity-related data all relating to vending and dispensing machines and to software, parts and fittings therefore, and to products sold or dispensed through such machines; advice relating to the management of business all relating to vending and dispensing machines and to software, parts and fittings therefore, and to products sold or dispensed through such machines; advisory services relating to business management and business operations all relating to vending and dispensing machines and to software, parts and fittings therefore, and to products sold or dispensed through such machines; business administration and management of information relating to consumer buying habits, logistics, reverse logistics, supply chain, and production systems and distribution solutions all relating to vending and dispensing machines and to software, parts and fittings therefore, and to products sold or dispensed through such machines; business consulting services relating to operations management services, logistics, reverse logistics, supply chain, and production systems and distribution solutions all relating to vending and dispensing machines and to software, parts and fittings therefore, and to products sold or dispensed through such machines; business intermediary and advisory services in the field of selling products and rendering services all relating to vending and dispensing machines and to software, parts and fittings therefore, and to products sold or dispensed through such machines; business planning all relating to vending and dispensing machines and to software, parts and fittings therefore, and to products sold or dispensed through such machines; information and data compiling and analyzing relating to business management all relating to vending and dispensing machines and to software, parts and fittings therefore, and to products sold or dispensed through such machines; Vending machine services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 20, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 15, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 18, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 18, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 2, 2007 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 15, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 3, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 1, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 25, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 15, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |