Drawing for COMPLIANCE WEEK

USPTO serial 78317876

COMPLIANCE WEEK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEAM, ALEX S
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COMPLIANCE WEEK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Amanda Pecchioni Thompson

JULIA SPOOR GARD BARNES & THORNBURG11 S MERIDIANINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46207UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Print publication, namely, magazines and newsletters concerning regulations promulgated by federal and state governments and by independent regulatory agenciesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 17, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 17, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 17, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 18, 2006EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Oct 12, 2005GRMLCORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED—
Oct 12, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Aug 30, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 8, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 8, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 4, 2005GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Aug 4, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Aug 4, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 23, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 23, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 26, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 26, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 25, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 7, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 28, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 10, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance