USPTO serial 78317876
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amanda Pecchioni Thompson
JULIA SPOOR GARD BARNES & THORNBURG11 S MERIDIANINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46207UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Print publication, namely, magazines and newsletters concerning regulations promulgated by federal and state governments and by independent regulatory agencies | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 26, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 26, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 25, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 28, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |