Drawing for WILDSTYLE

USPTO serial 78317909

WILDSTYLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TAYLOR, DAVID T
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - LEGAL INSTRUMENTS EXAMINER

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WILDSTYLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MATTHEW A. NEWBOLES

MATTHEW A NEWBOLES STETINA BRUNDA GARRED & BRUCKER75 ENTERPRISE STE 250ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Sports helmets, namely, football helmets; Prerecorded phonograph records, compact discs, and audio and video cassette tapes all featuring words on the subject of sports and musicACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely, pants, shorts, T-shirts, tank tops, sweat shirts, hats, wrist bands, head bands, football uniforms, football jerseysACTIVE—
028Sporting goods, namely, shoulder pads; Football equipment, namely, footballs, football helmets, mouth guards, football shoulder pads, football knee pads, striking bags, and hand wrapsACTIVE—
035Promoting public awareness of the need for youth sports activities and educationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 1, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 1, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 1, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 17, 2006IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
Jul 17, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2006INCEITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST—
May 26, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 24, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 2, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 21, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 5, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 24, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 24, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 15, 2005ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jan 7, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 24, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 7, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 7, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 30, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 30, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 20, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 10, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance