USPTO serial 78318394
OFFICE SOLUTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OFFICE SOLUTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joan L. Long
JOAN L LONG MAYER BROWN ROWE & MAW LLPPO BOX 2828CHICAGO, IL 60690-2828UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Insurance services, namely, insurance brokerage, insurance claims processing; financial services, namely, clearing of secure financial transactions through online services; financial analysis and consultation, providing financial information, issuance of securities, commercial lending services, financial portfolio management, discount brokerage services, brokerage of shares and business ventures, brokerage of fund shares, securities consulting and safe keeping, brokerage of productive investments and funds; financial sponsorship of sports, educational and entertainment programs and events; real estate services, namely brokerage, management, leasing, appraisal of real property; customs brokerage for third parties; monetary exchange; credit card services; telephone calling card services; electronic commerce services, namely, electronic debit and credit card processing services, funds transfer and payment processing services; providing information via the telephone and the global communication networks in the field of business and finance;; Insurance services, namely, insurance brokerage, insurance claims processing; financial services, namely, clearing of secure financial transactions through online services; financial analysis and consultation, providing financial information, issuance of securities, commercial lending services, financial portfolio management, discount brokerage services, brokerage of shares and business ventures, brokerage of fund shares, securities consulting and safe keeping, brokerage of productive investments and funds; financial sponsorship of sports, educational and entertainment programs and events; real estate services, namely brokerage, management, leasing, appraisal of real property; customs brokerage for third parties; monetary exchange; credit card services; telephone calling card services; electronic commerce services, namely, electronic debit and credit card processing services, funds transfer and payment processing services; providing information via the telephone and the global communication networks in the field of business and finance | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 20, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 22, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |