USPTO serial 78318454
MAKING THE CUT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAKING THE CUT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | pre-recorded audio and video cassettes | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | printed publications, namely, books of general interest and plastic or paper product packaging | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | clothing, namely, tops and bottoms, t-shirts, jerseys, polo shirts, caps, hats, footwear, hosiery, sweat shirts, sweat pants, pants, tank tops, shorts, sport shirts, warm up suits, jackets, parkas, head bands, wrist bands, ear muffs, gloves, and visors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 11, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 22, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |