Drawing for ICE RINK LEGENDS

USPTO serial 78318461

ICE RINK LEGENDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WOOD, CAROLINE
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ICE RINK LEGENDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gregory J. Marcot

GREGORY J MARCOT KRING & CHUNG LLP38 CORPORATE PARKIRVINE, CA 92623-9782UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing and headwear, namely, caps, hats and jerseysABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 24, 2005MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION
Jun 24, 2005ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Jun 24, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Jun 24, 2005OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999
May 12, 2005OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Jan 28, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Jan 4, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 15, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 29, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 22, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 19, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 8, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 29, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 29, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 12, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 15, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 15, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 6, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 24, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 24, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 12, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance