USPTO serial 78318558
CODICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENZMILLER, ANDREW
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CODICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SOLIERA (MODENA), IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS R. VIGIL
THOMAS R VIGIL WELSH & KATZ, LTD22ND FL120 S RIVERSIDE PLZCHICAGO, IL 60606-3912Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING AND KNITWEAR FOR MEN WOMEN AND CHILDREN IN ANY KIND OF FABRIC OR MATERIAL, NAMELY, ARTICLES OF OUTERCLOTHING, SUITS, DRESSES, SKIRTS, TROUSERS, SHIRTS, BLOUSES, CARDIGANS, PULLOVERS, SWEATERS, T-SHIRTS, VESTS, BRASSIERES, PANTS, KNICKERS, BELTS (CLOTHING) SUSPENDER BELTS, OVERALLS, OVERCOATS, GREAT COATS, JACKETS, BLAZERS, WIND RESISTANT JACKETS, RAINCOATS, STOCKINGS, SOCKS, HATS, SCARVES, FOULARD (CLOTHING), GLOVES FOR CLOTHING, TIES, BATHING SUITS, SHOES, SANDALS, HOSIERY, PANTY HOSE, BATH ROBES AND UNDERWEAR IN IC 025 | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 17, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 14, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |