Drawing for CASH FLOW SOLUTIONS

USPTO serial 78318677

CASH FLOW SOLUTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ESTRADA, LINDA M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CASH FLOW SOLUTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David M. Lafkas

David M. Lafkas LAFKAS PATENT LLCPO Box 43289Cincinnati, OH 45243-0289UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Check verification and collection servicesACTIVEMay 1, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 10, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 20, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 28, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 14, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 14, 2006EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 11, 2006EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 15, 2006GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
May 15, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Mar 21, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 20, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 20, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 21, 2005GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Sep 21, 2005CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Aug 30, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 24, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 24, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 16, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 12, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 12, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 1, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 1, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 11, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 8, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 4, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 4, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 4, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 4, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 1, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 9, 2004ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 9, 2004REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 27, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 14, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance