USPTO serial 78318727
HELIOFRESH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 14, 2007
- Examiner
- MARTIN, EUGENIA K
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with HELIOFRESH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*
Plus Government fees of $1,300
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
UBE-SHI, YAMAGUCHI-KEN, JP
Yamaguchi-ken, JP
Yamaguchi-ken, JP
Yamaguchi-ken, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bassam N. Ibrahim
Bassam N. Ibrahim Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney, P.C.1737 King Street, Suite 500ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-2727UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemicals, namely, 1,3-Benzodioxole-5-propanal, a-methyl, ceramic glazings, artificial sweeteners, flour and starch for industrial purposes, pulp for making paper | ACTIVE | Aug 24, 2005 |
| 003 | Synthetic perfumery, other perfumery fragrances and incenses, de-greasing preparations for household purposes, rust removing preparations, stain removing benzine, fabric softeners for laundry use, laundry bleach, adhesives for affixing false hair, adhesives for false eyelashes, laundry starch, seaweed gelatine for laundry use, namely funori, paint stripping preparations, shoe and boot cream, shoe black, namely shoe polish, soaps, dentifrices, cosmetics, Eau de Cologne, toiletries, namely shampoo, rinse, abrasive paper, namely sandpaper, abrasive cloth, abrasive sand, artificial pumice stone, polishing paper, false nails, false eyelashes | ACTIVE | Aug 24, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by UBE CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by UBE Industries, Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by UBE Industries, Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by UBE Industries, Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named HELIOFRESH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2022 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 22, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 22, 2017 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 11, 2017 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2017 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 5, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 23, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 12, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 14, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 22, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 2, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 24, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |