USPTO serial 78318738
MEDPREFERRED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAPPENFIELD, ANN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MEDPREFERRED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK G. MCCREARY
TIMOTHY J LYDEN HOGAN & HARTSON LLP8300 GREENSBORO DR STE 1100BOX IPMCLEAN, VA 22102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | "Loan services in the nature of financing higher education through the Federal Family Education Loan Program and other higher education loan financing programs; loan brokering services in the field of higher education" | ACTIVE | Jun 4, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 2, 2005 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 19, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 28, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 30, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |