USPTO serial 78318819
MNP MAISON DELLA NOCCIOLA PIEMONTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RINGLE, JAMES W
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MNP MAISON DELLA NOCCIOLA PIEMONTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark A. Steiner
MARK A STEINER TOWNSEND & TOWNSEND & CREW LLPTWO EMBARCADERO CTR 8TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3834UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Shelled nuts, hazel nuts, Piedmontese hazel nuts; hazelnut spreads | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Pastries made with or containing nuts, hazel nuts, Piedmontese hazel nuts; cakes and cookies made with or containing nuts, hazel nuts, Piedmontese hazel nuts; nougat, candies made with or containing nuts, hazel nuts, Piedmontese hazel nuts; pralines; confectionery made with or containing nuts, hazel nuts, Piedmontese hazel nuts; ice creams made with or containing nuts, hazel nuts, Piedmontese hazel nuts; chocolates made with or containing nuts, hazel nuts, Piedmontese hazel nuts; gianduja creams | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lino Lavorazione Industriale Nocciole S.r.l.
- Other trademarks owned by Lino Lavorazione Industriale Nocciole S.r.l.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named MNP MAISON DELLA NOCCIOLA PIEMONTE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 11, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 8, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 30, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 6, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 7, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 7, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 15, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 23, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 27, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 2, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 11, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 22, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |