USPTO serial 78318915
BASELINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3090989Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 9, 2006
- Examiner
- SAITO, KIM
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BASELINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
FOSTER CITY, CA
Ziff Davis Publishing Holdings Inc.
New York, NY
Other trademarks owned by Ziff Davis Publishing Holdings Inc.
Ziff Davis Publishing Holdings Inc.
New York, NY
Other trademarks owned by Ziff Davis Publishing Holdings Inc.
Ziff Davis Publishing Holdings Inc.
New York, NY
Other trademarks owned by Ziff Davis Publishing Holdings Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rosemary S. Tarlton
Rosemary S. Tarlton Morrison & Foerster LLP425 Market StreetSan Francisco, CA 94105-2482UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Professional services in the nature of design of interactive computer software and computer hardware to enable customers to analyze the returns they can expect on new uses of information technology | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by QUINSTREET, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Ziff Davis Publishing Holdings Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Ziff Davis Publishing Holdings Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Ziff Davis Publishing Holdings Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BASELINE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 27, 2017 | PRA7 | REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED | — |
| Apr 30, 2013 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Apr 30, 2013 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Apr 24, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 20, 2012 | WDRL | OTQR WITHDRAWAL FROM PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 13, 2012 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 10, 2012 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2012 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Dec 10, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 9, 2012 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2012 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2012 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 9, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 30, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 19, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 20, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 20, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 14, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 14, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 6, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 10, 2004 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | GNPE | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 26, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |