USPTO serial 78319212
HONEYRIDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HONEYRIDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SUENMAN LAM
LAM SUENMANPO BOX 803451CHICAGO, 60680U.S. ARMYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Event planning, namely, party planning; special event planning; providing theme decor for special events, namely, rental of stage scenery; providing audio-visual effects and entertainment for private and institutional special events, namely booking and rental of dance floors and entertainment halls | ACTIVE | Aug 15, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2007 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 19, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2006 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2006 | NAUD | SU - NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 12, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 12, 2006 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 8, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 22, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 4, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 14, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 22, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 22, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 22, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 1, 2004 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| May 27, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |