Drawing for MCDATA ECLIPSE

USPTO serial 78319278

MCDATA ECLIPSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MCDATA ECLIPSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Benjamin L. Blaugrund

BENJAMIN L BLAUGRUND HOLLAND & HART LLP555 SEVENTEENTH ST STE 2900 PODENVER, CO 80201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware; computer peripherals, namely switches for use in computer networks and computer storage area networksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 12, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jul 12, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 12, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 22, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 23, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 9, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 28, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 22, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 3, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 3, 2003PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance