USPTO serial 78319531
LE CORDON BLEU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 3, 2009
- Examiner
- ERVIN, INGA
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with LE CORDON BLEU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LE CORDON BLEU INTERNATIONAL B.V.
Amsterdam, NL
LE CORDON BLEU INTERNATIONAL B.V.
Amsterdam, NL
LE CORDON BLEU INTERNATIONAL B.V.
Amsterdam, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph D. Lewis
JOSEPH D. LEWIS BARNES & THORNBURG LLP1717 Pennsylvania Ave NW, STE 500WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | [ Electric and non-electric apparatus and appliances for the preparation of food, namely, electric tin and can openers; electric grinders and crushers; electric coffee mills; electric knives and scissors; electric whisks; electric machines for mincing and chopping meat; electric blenders; electric beaters; dishwashers; washing machines; kneading machines; electric apparatus for peeling and grating fruit; electric butter makers; electric food pressers; electric food processors; aerated beverage making machines, electro mechanical beverage preparation machines, sausage making machines; edible paste making machines ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 008 | [ Hand operated hand tools and implements, namely, hand-operated coffee grinders and pepper mills; ] cutlery, [ forks and ] spoons [ ; side arms, not including firearms, namely, hunting knives; razors; non-electric tin and can openers; non-electric apparatus for peeling and grating fruit; food pressers; hand-operated food processors ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | [ electric pepper mills and electric and non-electric whisks; household, kitchen and cooking utensils and containers not of precious metal or coated therewith, namely, sauce pans, skillets, Dutch ovens, casserole cookers, cooking racks and cups to fit the racks, strainers, and covers; glassware, porcelain and earthenware, namely, ] cups and mugs, coffee mugs [, drinking glasses, bowls, pans, dishes, saucers, soup tureens, serving dishes, figures, figurines, sculptures tea kettles, tea pots, ] tea sets | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | [ Preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies; ] jams; [ eggs; milk and butter; cheeses; cream and edible oils and fats; ] fruit preserves | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | [ Coffee, ] tea [ ; cocoa; sugar; rice; tapioca; sago, artificial coffee, namely, grain and chicory based coffee substitutes; flour; preparations made from cereals, namely, cereal based snack foods and ready to eat, cereal derived food bars; bread; biscuits; pastry and confectionery, namely, confectionery chips for baking and candy; flavored ices; honey; treacle; yeast; baking-powder; salt; mustard; vinegar; sauces; spices; ice, namely, cooling ice; salad dressings; dairy products, namely, ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LE CORDON BLEU INTERNATIONAL B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by LE CORDON BLEU INTERNATIONAL B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by LE CORDON BLEU INTERNATIONAL B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named LE CORDON BLEU
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2019 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 3, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 27, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2015 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2015 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 1, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 31, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2011 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - INFORMATION MADE OF RECORD | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 18, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 29, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 25, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 7, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |