USPTO serial 78319732
FAIRYLAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MEIER, SHARON A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FAIRYLAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William E. Alford
WILLIAM E ALFORD BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMANSEVENTH FL12400 WILSHIRE BLVDLOS ANGELES, CA 90025Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software featuring computer games; computer software for designing doll clothing; computer software for multimedia that enables computer interaction with users in the field of entertainment and education, namely computer software for entertainment and education; motion picture films and prerecorded video tapes featuring animation, actors and actresses of fictional characters in fictional stories; discs, namely, compact discs,dvds, laser discs, cd-roms, hdcd mini-discs, lp records, and 45 records all featuring music, sound recordings, still pictures,motion pictures and movies; pre-recorded audio cassettes featuring sound recordings; and pre-recorded video cassettes featuring fairytale movies, fairy tale stories, fairy tale rhymes, and fairy tale cartoons; game cartridges, namely video game cartridges and computer game cartridges; game controllers, namely computer joysticks and video game joysticks; and game discs, namely video game discs and computer game discs | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Books, namely children's fictional books including nursery-rhyme books and fairy tale books; books featuring fairy tales, nursery-rhymes and novels; magazines featuring fairy tales and nursery-rhymes; magazines, namely children's entertainment magazines; and cards, namely trading cards, post cards and greeting cards | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Dolls and accessories therefor; dolls and playsets therefor;nursery-rhyme dolls; doll clothing; doll costumes; doll cases;doll houses and furnishings therefor; playhouses; toy figures and accessories therefor; toy figures and playsets therefor; toys namely plush characters; toy vehicles; games, namely card games and board games; educational board games; game machines, namely stand-alone video game machines and electronic hand held game machines; game tables; and board games | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 13, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |