Drawing for RUB-R-WALL AIRTIGHT

USPTO serial 78319736

RUB-R-WALL AIRTIGHT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3075547Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 4, 2006
Examiner
BLOHM, LINDA
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with RUB-R-WALL AIRTIGHT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Tama L. Drenski

Tama L. Drenski Renner Kenner Greive Bobak Taylor & Weber106 S. Main StreetSuite 400Akron, OH 44308

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001chemical coating compositions used to provide an air barrier membrane for above-ground concrete and block wall masonrySECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJan 31, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 19, 2026CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Apr 4, 2025REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2024ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 23, 2024REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2024CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 23, 2024COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2024ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 8, 2015NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
May 8, 2015RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
May 8, 201589AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
May 8, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 23, 2015E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Apr 4, 2015REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Mar 31, 2012NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Mar 31, 2012C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Mar 31, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 21, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 1, 2012E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 9, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 4, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 10, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 21, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 21, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 18, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 10, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 10, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 9, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 9, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 9, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 9, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 25, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 25, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 17, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 17, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 17, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 17, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 4, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 12, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 5, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 21, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance