USPTO serial 78319897
MAXXIM CONCEPTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3243497Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 22, 2007
- Examiner
- PIGNATELLO, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MAXXIM CONCEPTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Corporate Images Holdings Partnership
Langley, CA
Other trademarks owned by Corporate Images Holdings Partnership
Corporate Images Holdings Partnership
Langley, CA
Other trademarks owned by Corporate Images Holdings Partnership
Corporate Images Holdings Partnership
Langley, CA
Other trademarks owned by Corporate Images Holdings Partnership
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Seann W. Hallisky
SEANN W HALLISKY CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON KINDNESS PLSTE 28001420 FIFTH AVESEATTLE, WA 98101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Furniture, namely, audio/video furniture, home theatre furniture, speaker stands; bookcases, media storage furniture, storage cabinets | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Corporate Images Holdings Partnership
- Other trademarks owned by Corporate Images Holdings Partnership
- Other trademarks owned by Corporate Images Holdings Partnership
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named MAXXIM CONCEPTS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 22, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 6, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 14, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 1, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 1, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 30, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 5, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 6, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 18, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 26, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |