Drawing for BINGO BEAR WAS HERE

USPTO serial 78320280

BINGO BEAR WAS HERE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BINGO BEAR WAS HERE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Childrens BooksACTIVEJan 1, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 1, 2006PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Feb 15, 2006PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jan 17, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 12, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 8, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 5, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 25, 2005UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 6, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 5, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 20, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2004MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 30, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 30, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 4, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 21, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance