Drawing for DANS LE JARDIN

USPTO serial 78320300

DANS LE JARDIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CAPSHAW, DANIEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DANS LE JARDIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Martha Gayle Barber

MARTHA GAYLE BARBER ALSTON & BIRD LLP101 S TRYON ST STE 4000CHARLOTTE, NC 28280-4000UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Bathroom accessories made of metal, namely, robe hooks, and shower curtain hooks and ringsACTIVE—
020Bed pillows, decorative pillows, hampers, metal and non-metal bathroom shelves, non-metal robe hooks and non-metal shower curtain hooks and ringsACTIVE—
021Bathroom accessories, namely, soap dishes, toothbrush holders, waste baskets, bathroom tumblers, liquid soap and lotion pump dispensers, metal and non-metal towel bars, tissue holders and bath and shower caddiesACTIVE—
024Mattress pads, bed sheet sets, bed sheets, pillow cases, pillow shams, bed skirts, blankets, comforters, down comforters, duvets, quilts, coverlets, throws, bath towels, bath sheets, shower curtains, and fabric window valances and sheer panels, namely, sheer fabric curtainsACTIVE—
027Woven rugs, bath rugs, bath mats, and rubber bathtub matsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 8, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 8, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 7, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 7, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 7, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 13, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 13, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 13, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 7, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 15, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 23, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 8, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 3, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 29, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 9, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 13, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
May 13, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
May 13, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 21, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance