Drawing for NEXT GENERATION NETWORK TECHNOLOGY. NOW

USPTO serial 78320365

NEXT GENERATION NETWORK TECHNOLOGY. NOW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEAM, ALEX S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEXT GENERATION NETWORK TECHNOLOGY. NOW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Tsan Abrahamson

TRAN ABRAHAMSON ABRAHAMSON GROUP PC821 BANCROFT WAYBERKELEY, CA 94710UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Consulting services for others in the area of computer hardware related to telecommunication systems, namely, installation and equipment upgrades of computer hardwareACTIVE—
041Education and training services for others, namely, conducting classes, seminars, and workshops in the field of installation, troubleshooting, maintenance and repair of computer hardware, computer software, telecommunications equipment, and telecommunication systemsACTIVE—
042Technical consulting services for others in the area of computer hardware and software related to telecommunication systems, namely, operational systems, technical assessment and design for others of network systems, network management systems, switching network management, installation of computer software, custom application development, systems integration, computer project management; remote technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems and repair of computer softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 7, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 3, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 17, 2005CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 14, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 9, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 20, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 31, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 23, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 5, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 2, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 16, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 16, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 12, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 21, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance