USPTO serial 78320557
CATALYST LAW GROUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARLYLE, SHAUNIA P
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CATALYST LAW GROUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Legal Services in the Fields of Biotechnology Law, namely Intellectual Property Law, Business Law and Corporate Law | ACTIVE | Nov 20, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 5, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 5, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 20, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |