Drawing for UPPER CRUST

USPTO serial 78320666

UPPER CRUST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OH, WON TEAK
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UPPER CRUST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark Kusner

MARK KUSNER KUSNER & JAFFE6151 WILSON MILLS RD STE 310HIGHLAND PLHIGHLAND HEIGHTS, OH 44143-2128

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030fully baked, par-baked, proof-and-bake and frozen bakery products, namely-- bread; baguettes; puff pastry, namely, turnovers, strudel, puff pastry squares, puff pastry slabs, puff pastry sticks, puff pastry formed in the shape of fans and palm leaves, puff pastry rolls with sausage filling, and puff pastry rolls with ground beef filling; danish pastry, namely, twisted danish pastry, rolled danish butter horns, cheese and fruit filled danish pastry, danish dough slabs, and coffee cake; cinnamon rolls; and croissants, all for wholesale distributionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 2, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 18, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 18, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 30, 2007EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Oct 10, 2006GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 10, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Aug 30, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 3, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 3, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 5, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 5, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 16, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 30, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 30, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 20, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 14, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 14, 2004CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 13, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 26, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 24, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 24, 2004CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 23, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 18, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 18, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 30, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 18, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 21, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance