USPTO serial 78321182
AUTHOR UNIVERSITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AUTHOR UNIVERSITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kyle Anne Citrynell
KYLE ANNE CITRYNELL SEILLER & HANDMAKER, LLPSTE 2200462 S FOURTH AVELOUISVILLE, KY 40202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | motion picture films, audio and audiovideo tapes, cassettes and discs, educational training software for use in schedule and contact management, docketing and calendaring and correspondence tracking, interactive media products and CD-ROMs, CDs and DVDs, featuring programs and information relating to writing, editing, publishing and career direction; mouse pads | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | printed publications and paper goods, namely, books, magazines, manuals, pamphlets, work booklets, and workbooks all in the field of writing, editing, publishing and career direction; photographs, calendars, greeting cards and blank journals; desk blotters; pencils and pens; texts in the field of writing, editing, publishing and career direction | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | online computer database services in the field of business information, namely, business support services in the field of writing, editing, publishing and career direction and containing information and contracts of interest to writers and students in the field of writing; business consultation in the field of writing, editing, publishing and career direction; online retail stores, retail stores and mail order catalogs featuring motion pictures, audio and audio video products, CDs and DVDs, software, CD-ROMs and interactive media products, books and publications, posters, pamphlets, calendars, greeting cards, journals, coffee mugs, drinking glasses, mouse pads, desk blotters, computer accessories, office supplies and equipment, briefcases, knapsacks, book bags and tote bags | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | educational services, namely, seminars and one-on-one mentoring in the field of writing, editing, publishing and career direction | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Page One Productions, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named AUTHOR UNIVERSITY
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 10, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 12, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 14, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 11, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 5, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 5, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 26, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |