USPTO serial 78321822
COBELLA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEEL, ALYSSA PALADINO
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COBELLA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John S. Egbert
JOHN S EGBERT HARRISON & EGBERT412 MAIN ST 7TH FLHOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Fragrance products, namely, cologne, eau de toilette, perfume, scented soaps, body powders, bath oils; cosmetic products, namely, lipstick, foundation, blush, eye shadow, mascara, eyeliner, lipstick liner, nail polish, nail polish remover; skin treatment products, namely, cleanser, toner, moisturizer, eye cream, makeup remover, hand and body lotion; body and facial soap; sun screen, tanning lotion; hair products, namely, shampoos, conditioners, styling gels, mousse, sprays, hair straightening preparations, hair styling preparations, hair waving lotions, hair bleaching preparations, hair coloring preparations; essential oils for personal use; Fragrance products, namely, cologne, eau de toilette, perfume, scented soaps, body powders, bath oils; cosmetic products, namely, lipstick, foundation, blush, eye shadow, mascara, eyeliner, lipstick liner, nail polish, nail polish remover; skin treatment products, namely, cleanser, toner, moisturizer, eye cream, makeup remover, hand and body lotion; body and facial soap; sun screen, tanning lotion; hair products, namely, shampoos, conditioners, styling gels, mousse, sprays, hair straightening preparations, hair styling preparations, hair waving lotions, hair bleaching preparations, hair coloring preparations; essential oils for personal use | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Hairstyling and hairdressing services; hair salon services; beauty salon services; Hairstyling and hairdressing services; hair salon services; beauty salon services | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 26, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 5, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 30, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 5, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 1, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 5, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 9, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |