Drawing for SQUEEGEE PRIME

USPTO serial 78322049

SQUEEGEE PRIME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAPPENFIELD, ANN
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SQUEEGEE PRIME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Arthi K. Tirey, Reg. No. 50,960

ARTHI K TIREY REG NO 50 960 C/O THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY1100 MIDLAND BLDG LEGAL DEPT101 PROSPECT AVE NWCLEVELAND, OH 44115-1075

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
002protective and decorative coatings in the nature of paint, namely automotive primersACTIVEFeb 5, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 14, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 14, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 14, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 8, 2006EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 21, 2005GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 21, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Sep 20, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 30, 2005GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Aug 30, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jul 21, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 20, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 20, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 20, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 20, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 20, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 20, 2005IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Dec 9, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 9, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 22, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 22, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 21, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 10, 2004AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 16, 2004IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Feb 16, 2004EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance