Drawing for ESPRESSIVA

USPTO serial 78322167

ESPRESSIVA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3639554Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 16, 2009
Examiner
GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ESPRESSIVA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Katrina Edge

KATRINA EDGE BAKER & HOSTETLER LLPWASHINGTON SQUARE SUITE 11001050 CONNECTICUT AVENUE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Electric coffee grindersSECTION 18 - CANCELLED—
011Electric coffee machines for use with coffee bags; electric espresso machines; electric coffee machines; electric mocha machines; electric water kettles; electric egg boilers; electric toastersSECTION 18 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 8, 2014C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Jul 8, 2014CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jun 27, 2014CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Feb 24, 2014PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jun 16, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 31, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 11, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 24, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 23, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 23, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 23, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 23, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 23, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 23, 2009ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2008GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 8, 2008GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 8, 2008CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Mar 6, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 6, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 26, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 26, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 26, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 26, 2007ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Nov 26, 2007GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 26, 2007GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 26, 2007CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Nov 24, 2007RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 23, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 23, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 23, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 23, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 22, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 22, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 21, 2006GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 21, 2006CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jun 20, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 16, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 25, 2006PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Apr 17, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 17, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Apr 17, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 19, 2005GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jul 10, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2005GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 17, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 16, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 16, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 9, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 9, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2005GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jul 4, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 17, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 17, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 28, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 28, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 26, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 25, 2003AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Nov 25, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 25, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance