USPTO serial 78322167
ESPRESSIVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 16, 2009
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ESPRESSIVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
PETRA-ELECTRIC PETER HOHLFELDT GmbH & Co. KG
BURGAU, DE
Other trademarks owned by PETRA-ELECTRIC PETER HOHLFELDT GmbH & Co. KG
PETRA-ELECTRIC PETER HOHLFELDT GmbH & Co. KG
BURGAU, DE
Other trademarks owned by PETRA-ELECTRIC PETER HOHLFELDT GmbH & Co. KG
PETRA-ELECTRIC PETER HOHLFELDT GmbH & Co. KG
BURGAU, DE
Other trademarks owned by PETRA-ELECTRIC PETER HOHLFELDT GmbH & Co. KG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Katrina Edge
KATRINA EDGE BAKER & HOSTETLER LLPWASHINGTON SQUARE SUITE 11001050 CONNECTICUT AVENUE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electric coffee grinders | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | Electric coffee machines for use with coffee bags; electric espresso machines; electric coffee machines; electric mocha machines; electric water kettles; electric egg boilers; electric toasters | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PETRA-ELECTRIC PETER HOHLFELDT GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by PETRA-ELECTRIC PETER HOHLFELDT GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by PETRA-ELECTRIC PETER HOHLFELDT GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named ESPRESSIVA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2014 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Jul 8, 2014 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 24, 2014 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 31, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 11, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 26, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 24, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 23, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 23, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 22, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2006 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 10, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 4, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 4, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |