Drawing for EL ORIGINAL LICOR DE CAJETA

USPTO serial 78322532

EL ORIGINAL LICOR DE CAJETA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAN, DAWN L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EL ORIGINAL LICOR DE CAJETA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JULIE B. SEYLER

JULIE B SEYLER ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages, namely, liqueursACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 14, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 20, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 12, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 12, 2005EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 13, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 28, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 22, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 17, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 24, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 17, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 14, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 28, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance