Drawing for EQUITY LEVERAGE ANALYSIS

USPTO serial 78322727

EQUITY LEVERAGE ANALYSIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JACKSON, STEVEN W
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EQUITY LEVERAGE ANALYSIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lew Hansen

LEW HANSEN SHERIDAN ROSS PC1560 BROADWAY STE 1200DENVER, CO 80202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035"Market research; business marketing consulting services; conducting marketing studies; providing an interactive web site via a global computer information network featuring market research and business marketing management information;"ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 21, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 1, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 1, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 1, 2005EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 19, 2005GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jul 11, 2005ATRQATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED—
Jul 6, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 6, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 6, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 6, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 8, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 8, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 6, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 17, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 1, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance