USPTO serial 78322776
EFALOCK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 24, 2009
- Examiner
- MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with EFALOCK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
EFALOCK Professional Tools GMBH
Bad Kissingen, DE
EFALOCK Professional Tools GMBH
Bad Kissingen, DE
EFALOCK Professional Tools GMBH
Würzburg, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Molly T. Eichten
Molly T. Eichten Larkin Hoffman Daly & Lindgren Ltd.8300 Norman Center DriveSuite 1000Minneapolis, MN 55437-1060Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | [ CUTTING, MANICURE AND PEDICURE TOOLS, NAMELY, SCISSORS AND KNIFES, RAZORS AND RAZOR-BLADES, SAFETY-RAZORS, CUTICLE FORCEPS, NAIL CLIPPERS, TWEEZERS, NAIL FILES, NAIL BUFFERS, CORN REMOVERS AND CORN GRATERS, NAIL CUTICLE KNIFES, AND ELECTRIC MINI HAIR TRIMMERS ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | [ ELECTRICAL APPLIANCES FOR THE HAIRDRESSERS' TRADE, NAMELY, DRYER HOODS FIXEDLY MOUNTED OR MOUNTED UPON A MOVEABLE TRIPOD FOR THE DRYING OF CLIENTS' HAIR, HAIR DRYERS WITH HOLDERS, HAIR TRIMMERS, ELECTRIC HEATED HAIR STYLERS FOR THE STYLING OF CLIENTS' HAIR, AND HOT-AIR DRYERS WITH ATTACHED BRUSH ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | [ PRINTED EDUCATIONAL AND TEACHING MATERIALS FOR THE TRAINING OF HAIRDRESSERS, HAIR-STYLE BOOKS, PRINTED NOTEPADS MADE OF PAPER, PLASTIC BAGS, ALL USED IN THE HAIRDRESSING BUSINESS ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | HAIR AND COSMETIC SALON FURNITURE AND THEIR PARTS, NAMELY, ROLLER STOOLS, SALON CARTS WITH CASTORS, [ COSMETIC BEDS, BARBER CHAIRS, KIDS CHAIRS, HEAD AND FOOT RESTS, ] [ MIRRORS, WALL-PROTECTION PLATES MADE OF PLASTIC AND PLACED BEHIND CHAIR FOOTRESTS TO PROTECT THE WALLS IN A HAIRDRESSER STORE,TRAINING MANNEQUIN HEAD STANDS AND TABLE-HOLDERS AND THEIR PARTS, TOUPEE STANDS MADE OF METAL OR PLASTIC, NECK PILLOWS, ] AND HAND MIRRORS, REUSABLE PLASTIC NECK PROTECTOR TRAYS TO PROTECT AGAINST HAIR CLIPPINGS, REUSABLE PLASTIC HAIR CUTTING COLLARS TO PROTECT AGAINST HAIR CLIPPINGS, [ PLASTIC PRICE BOARDS, ] AND PLASTIC EQUIPMENT BOXES AND PLASTIC ROLL OFF BOXES FOR USE IN THE HAIRDRESSING INDUSTRY | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | EMPTY CONTAINERS FOR THE HAIRDRESSING TRADE, NAMELY, SPRAY AND APPLICATION BOTTLES, BOWLS, SOAP AND TINT BOWLS, [SOAP DISHES, ] RINSING BOXES MADE OF PLASTICS FOR THE CLEANING OF PERM RODS, [ SHAVING-SOAP BOWLS, ] TUBE SQUEEZERS, BRISTLE TOOLS FOR THE HAIRDRESSERS TRADE, NAMELY, [ HAIR BRUSHES, CLOTHES-BRUSHES, SALON BROOMS, POWDER AND SHAVING BRUSHES, NECK BRUSHES AND DUSTERS, ] HAIR TINT BRUSHES, TOOLS FOR HAIR AND BODY CARE, NAMELY, COMBS MADE OF [ METAL AND ] PLASTIC, AND APPLICATION AND FIXING SPONGES | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | [ HAND AND EYE TOWELS MADE OF TEXTILE ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | [ HAIRDRESSERS' CLOTHING, NAMELY, CAPES, APRONS, AND HAIRDRESSING CAPES MADE OF FABRIC OR PLASTIC ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 026 | [ PERM RODS, PERM CLAMS, PERM CLIPS, AND PERM STICKS ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EFALOCK Professional Tools GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by EFALOCK Professional Tools GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by EFALOCK Professional Tools GMBH
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Similar marks named EFALOCK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2019 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2019 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 11, 2019 | 9G8P | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| Oct 11, 2019 | 8PRT | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | 8.PR | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2016 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 23, 2016 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 8, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 19, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 14, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 22, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 22, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 11, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 30, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 29, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 26, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 10, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 9, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 8, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 16, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 16, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 31, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |