CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for SMART TALK WOMEN'S LECTURE SERIES

USPTO serial 78322929

SMART TALK WOMEN'S LECTURE SERIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3105868Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 20, 2006
Examiner
LAMOTHE, LESLEY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - LEGAL INSTRUMENTS EXAMINER

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with SMART TALK WOMEN'S LECTURE SERIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sabrina C. Stavish

SABRINA C STAVISH SHERIDAN ROSS PCSTE 12001560 BROADWAYDENVER, CO 80202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Education and entertainment services, namely, lectures and other oral presentations given by speakers who are women regarding various topics which are intended to educate and entertain attendeesSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 25, 2013C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Jun 4, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 20, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 28, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 8, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 15, 2006CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 13, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 9, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 4, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 1, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 31, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 8, 2005GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 8, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 27, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 21, 2005CWBPWITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION—
Apr 25, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 15, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 13, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 13, 2005IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Mar 18, 2005AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 11, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 3, 2005IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Mar 3, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 3, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 3, 2005EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 28, 2004CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 17, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 10, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 10, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 15, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 1, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance