Drawing for THE FLEXIBLE WHITEBOARD

USPTO serial 78322941

THE FLEXIBLE WHITEBOARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRAY, CAROLYN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE FLEXIBLE WHITEBOARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel J. McMullen

DANIEL J MCMULLEN CALFEE, HALTER & GRISWOLD LLP1400 MCDONALD INVESTMENT CTR800 SUPERIOR AVECLEVELAND, OH 44114

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
027Wall coveringsACTIVEOct 20, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 8, 2020ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 4, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 11, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 11, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 29, 2007EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 8, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 5, 2007GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Apr 9, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 26, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 26, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 28, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 28, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 8, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 10, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 11, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 9, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 7, 2005OHERON HOLD - EXAMINING ATTORNEY REQUEST—
Dec 21, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 17, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 15, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 3, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 24, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 24, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 25, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 1, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance