USPTO serial 78323025
OMEGA-3 UPLIFT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OMEGA-3 UPLIFT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Fredericksburg, TX
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Nutritional bars, namely, ready to eat nut and seed food bars, granola based snack bars, ready to eat cereal derived food bars, snack mixes consisting primarily of crackers, pretzels, candied nuts and/or popped popcorn, processed health cereal, breakfast health cereals, chocolate-based ready-to-eat food bars | ACTIVE | Mar 7, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2006 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jul 15, 2006 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 17, 2004 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 1, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |