Drawing for ONE 1 COT

USPTO serial 78323026

ONE 1 COT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CORDOVA, RAUL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ONE 1 COT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John S. Egbert

JOHN S EGBERT HARRISON & EGBERT412 MAIN ST 7TH FLHOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
023Yarns and threads for use with textilesACTIVE—
024Fabrics, namely, woven fabrics made of wool, worsted wool, worsted fabric, blends of wool and cotton fabric, silk and wool blend fabrics, cotton knit fabrics, wool knit fabrics; synthetic fiber fabrics; curtains and draperies made of textile fabrics; table fabrics, namely, coasters, runners, tablecloths, placemats, fabric napkins; bed fabrics, namely, bed sheets, bed spreads, pillow cases, pillow shams, comforters, duvet covers, dust ruffles, blankets, mattress covers, quilts; household linen; upholstery fabricsINACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED—
025Clothing for sailors, namely, shirts, pants, jackets, suits, shorts, socks, underwear, uniforms, footwear, and head wearINACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 23, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 23, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 29, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 29, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 28, 2005EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
May 24, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 24, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 24, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 24, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 10, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 29, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 12, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 1, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance