USPTO serial 78323058
8 GLASSES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3716932Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 24, 2009
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with 8 GLASSES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Chino Hills, CA
Chino Hills, CA
Chino Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Walter G. Maxwell
Walter G. Maxwell Christie, Parker & Hale, LLPPost Office Box 7068Pasadena, CA 91109-7068UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | BOTTLED DRINKING WATER FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 7, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 16, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 16, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 18, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 4, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 20, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 26, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 6, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 8, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 8, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 10, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 1, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |