USPTO serial 78323068
DON'T JUST MAKE A CALL...MAKE AN INFONE CALL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- TRADEMARK ASSISTANCE CENTER
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DON'T JUST MAKE A CALL...MAKE AN INFONE CALL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Beaverton, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Beth M. Goldman
BETH M GOLDMAN HELLER EHRMAN WHITE MCAULIFFE LLP333 BUSH STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104-2878UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing telephone numbers, pager numbers, facsimile numbers, names and addresses, URL's and electronic mail addresses; providing information about products or services associated with businesses and business names; maintaining computer database files containing individuals' and/or businesses' customized collections of communications information such as address, telephone, pager and fax numbers, e-mail addresses and URLs, contact lists, and credit card numbers; providing information about and making referrals for retail services concerning products, services, events, activities, attractions and facilities in particular geographic locations; looking up and providing information about businesses closest to target geographical location, providing information about the goods and services of others via telephone | ACTIVE | Oct 27, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2007 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 18, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 18, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 7, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |