USPTO serial 78323310
TOKYO ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3195605Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 9, 2007
- Examiner
- WAHLBERG, STACY B
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TOKYO ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
The Tokyo Electric Power Company, Incorporated
Tokyo, JP
Other trademarks owned by The Tokyo Electric Power Company, Incorporated
The Tokyo Electric Power Company, Incorporated
Tokyo, JP
Other trademarks owned by The Tokyo Electric Power Company, Incorporated
The Tokyo Electric Power Company, Incorporated
Tokyo, JP
Other trademarks owned by The Tokyo Electric Power Company, Incorporated
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM E. MARAMES
WILLIAM E MARAMES ARENT FOX KINTNER PLOTKIN & KAHN, PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5399UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Electricity distribution; Consulting in the field of supply of electric power; Consulting in the field of electric power transmission; Consulting in the field of electric power distribution; Distribution of hot water and steam from thermo- genetic plants to building and houses through pipes for heating | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Research on building construction and city planning; Testing and research on prevention of pollution; Testing and research on electricity; Testing and research on civil engineering; Architectural design; Technical consulting and providing expertise in the field of selecting the most appropriate plan for reducing costs, power safety, providing information about systems which feature low running costs and energy conservation | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Tokyo Electric Power Company, Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by The Tokyo Electric Power Company, Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by The Tokyo Electric Power Company, Incorporated
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named TOKYO ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 24, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 4, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | PDCB | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 6, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 13, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 24, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 20, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 16, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 4, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 5, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 28, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 28, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 7, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |