USPTO serial 78323454
QUALITY REFACING SERVICES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KAZAZIAN, MICHAEL H
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QUALITY REFACING SERVICES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edgar A. Zarins
EDGAR A ZARINS MASCO CORPORATION21001 VAN BORN RDTAYLOR, MI 48180-1300UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | CONSTRUCTION AND REMODELING SERVICES, NAMELY, CUSTOM CONSTRUCTION OF KITCHEN AND BATH CABTNETRY | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | ABND | ABANDONMENT DELETED BY TTAB | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 2, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 8, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 17, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 26, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |